dumb people with "drones"

Intlwaters

Help Support Intlwaters:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I'm a pretty good shot with a 10 gauge... I consider my property a "no fly zone". If a person is dumb enough to fly over it with one of these things they just might suffer the consequences. Then they can explain to the authority's just what they were doing and how they plan to retrieve what's left of their property now that it has "crash" landed on my land. I don't allow trespassers. That's my story and I'm stick'n to it! Benefits of country living... Not sure how that would go over in town, Lol
 
I'm a pretty good shot with a 10 gauge... I consider my property a "no fly zone". If a person is dumb enough to fly over it with one of these things they just might suffer the consequences. Then they can explain to the authority's just what they were doing and how they plan to retrieve what's left of their property now that it has "crash" landed on my land. I don't allow trespassers. That's my story and I'm stick'n to it! Benefits of country living... Not sure how that would go over in town, Lol
Apparently, this doesn't go over well at all. There have been several drones shot down by trespassing over private property, but we don't own the airspace over our property, according to the FAA. Yes, I agree with and would/will do the same if I catch one over my place, but according to 'the law', we are responsible for the damage to said drone as well as any firearm discharge laws applicable. As the story above, the owner of the drone shot down by the fire department sued the department for destruction of private property-and won.......... Best you can do is post your property as a 'No Drone Zone' for now.
 
Yes, sadly I agree... But it sure would be hoot! Ha ha ha! I think what bugs me the most is the ability of these things to spy on people. There are already cases of these thing being used as high tech peeping Tom devices. When will enough be enough? Just make certain to yell " It's coming right for me!" Before you shoot... Then claim self defense! Ha ha ha! Officer, it was me or the whirlygig thing... Whirlygig didn't make it...
 
I'm a pretty good shot with a 10 gauge... I consider my property a "no fly zone". If a person is dumb enough to fly over it with one of these things they just might suffer the consequences. Then they can explain to the authority's just what they were doing and how they plan to retrieve what's left of their property now that it has "crash" landed on my land. I don't allow trespassers. That's my story and I'm stick'n to it! Benefits of country living... Not sure how that would go over in town, Lol
Apparently, this doesn't go over well at all. There have been several drones shot down by trespassing over private property, but we don't own the airspace over our property, according to the FAA. Yes, I agree with and would/will do the same if I catch one over my place, but according to 'the law', we are responsible for the damage to said drone as well as any firearm discharge laws applicable. As the story above, the owner of the drone shot down by the fire department sued the department for destruction of private property-and won.......... Best you can do is post your property as a 'No Drone Zone' for now.
There was a guy in either Kentucky or Tennessee that shot down a drone that was hovering above his deck and was taking video of the inside of his house. He used a shotgun loaded with #8 birdshot to take it down and, when the owner of the drone showed up with "friends" to pick it up, he used a holstered pistol as a deterrent to keep the operator off his property. When the police showed up, it was the homeowner that was arrested for discharging a fire arm in a residential area. Had it been my house, it would have been a fishing net or baseball bat being used to take the thing down. With either one of them, there is no way the operator can say he was flying harmlessly by.
 
Sorry guys but there's something seriously wrong with the mentality that it's okay to shoot something/anyone that invades your personal bubble or crosses your property line. Being from Canada with much stricter gun laws we seldom see a hand gun, let alone hear them go off in our back yard. It worries me when I see fellow boaters show them off to each other at races under their canopies. Even worse is when I see guys carrying one on their hip (covered by a T shirt or in a pouch) the entire weekend. Call me naive but I don't understand the need to carry a gun to a model boat race or to work every day. Just Say'n.
 
I agree there Ron that is stupid to have them at a race and carry them around with them no reason for it and i dont see a reason to carry one at all mine stays in the house period
 
I agree there Ron that is stupid to have them at a race and carry them around with them no reason for it and i dont see a reason to carry one at all mine stays in the house period
There are some local and federal law enforcement agencies that do require their personnel to have a weapon at all times. That being said, a small pistol could be carried in a tool box or in the vehicle/trailer so that it could be accessed quickly if needed. I totally agree, carrying a hand gun on your person at a race is asking for trouble.

Ron, the US Constitution says all citizens are allowed to possess and carry weapons so, unfortunately, many do just because they can. Obviously this is within the restrictions of local and federal laws
 
I respect everyone's opinion... That being said I do carry a weapon, it's my right. I'd rather have it and not need it than wish I had it when the unfortunate time came that I did not. Now, I do agree with the above statements. I know that some people are uncomfortable knowing that someone is carrying a weapon. That is also why I take care to make sure that it is legally concealed and the ordinary person in passing would not see it. And to the statements I made about shooting down a drone it was mostly poking fun, but if I at All felt threatend by one or felt it was invading my privacy... Well It will get lead thrown at it at a very high velocity.
 
Everybody has rights its when you miss use a right they will be taken away.So if you got a person flying a drone in your space go talk to them.If they want to be a jerk then use your rights.Everybody needs to use better judgment.Better yet text them most people can be a bada$$ when not in person
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I respect everyone's opinion... That being said I do carry a weapon, it's my right. I'd rather have it and not need it than wish I had it when the unfortunate time came that I did not. Now, I do agree with the above statements. I know that some people are uncomfortable knowing that someone is carrying a weapon. That is also why I take care to make sure that it is legally concealed and the ordinary person in passing would not see it. And to the statements I made about shooting down a drone it was mostly poking fun, but if I at All felt threatend by one or felt it was invading my privacy... Well It will get lead thrown at it at a very high velocity.
X-2...you would not even know when I am carrying mine. One of the first things to learn after gun safety,how to best keep it concealed. Also as someone else said,it is best not to have a Show and Tell with your gun when you are in public. Common sense,is not very common.
 
Guys,

A lot of people are opposed to guns carried in public until their lives are tragically impacted, directly or otherwise, by the lack of one. Personally, I kind of think it's an ego thing to see a gun on somebody's hip, but I feel safer when I see it. I won't be the guy with one visible on my hip, but I will have one on me at all times as soon as I get my CCW (which is the plan). An armed society is, by nature, polite.

Restrictive gun laws are instated under the ignorant assumption that the laws themselves will prevent violence. Statistics have proven, time and time again, the opposite is the case. There have been numerous accounts of tragedy being averted by the presence of a single gun-carrying, law-abiding citizen. I wouldn't think there would be a need for a gun at one of our races, but we all send our kids off every day without a single thought about any violence erupting at their schools. Or at least we used to.

It's been said before, but it's pretty simple: You're either going to be a victim or you're not, and having some counter-measure on hand will most likely make all the difference.

We have had several firearms in our household for quite some time, but they've all been long guns. we recently had a string of cars rooted through in our neighborhood, with garage door openers being the one common thing stolen, ours included, which propelled us to make a purchase. We are now prepared, kids included (they are both very familiar), to maintain our own safety.

As for the drones, I wouldn't shoot one down, as that would violate our local laws as stated above, but I can promise you that the owner would never get it back in one piece if I caught it on my property and I could get to it. It would be in a dumpster somewhere nearby in a drastic state of disassembly, by way of a blanket and a baseball bat.

Thanks. Brad.

Titan Racing Components

BlackJack Hydros

Model Machine And Precision LLC
 
Guys,

A lot of people are opposed to guns carried in public until their lives are tragically impacted, directly or otherwise, by the lack of one. Personally, I kind of think it's an ego thing to see a gun on somebody's hip, but I feel safer when I see it. I won't be the guy with one visible on my hip, but I will have one on me at all times as soon as I get my CCW (which is the plan). An armed society is, by nature, polite.

Restrictive gun laws are instated under the ignorant assumption that the laws themselves will prevent violence. Statistics have proven, time and time again, the opposite is the case. There have been numerous accounts of tragedy being averted by the presence of a single gun-carrying, law-abiding citizen. I wouldn't think there would be a need for a gun at one of our races, but we all send our kids off every day without a single thought about any violence erupting at their schools. Or at least we used to.

It's been said before, but it's pretty simple: You're either going to be a victim or you're not, and having some counter-measure on hand will most likely make all the difference.

We have had several firearms in our household for quite some time, but they've all been long guns. we recently had a string of cars rooted through in our neighborhood, with garage door openers being the one common thing stolen, ours included, which propelled us to make a purchase. We are now prepared, kids included (they are both very familiar), to maintain our own safety.

As for the drones, I wouldn't shoot one down, as that would violate our local laws as stated above, but I can promise you that the owner would never get it back in one piece if I caught it on my property and I could get to it. It would be in a dumpster somewhere nearby in a drastic state of disassembly, by way of a blanket and a baseball bat.

Thanks. Brad.

Titan Racing Components

BlackJack Hydros

Model Machine And Precision LLC

So call me naive and ignorant Brad but I live in one of the top 10 safest countries in the world that has one of the most restrictive concealed weapons laws. With your way of thinking would it be even safer if we gave everyone a gun to carry around with them, or just more polite?
 
Ron,

I knew this was coming.....
default_rolleyes.gif


No. I'm not calling anybody ignorant. It's that the laws are born of fear and lack of understanding (read: ignorance). I'm only saying the guns are not the problem, it's the people. My .45 stays in my nightstand, day in and day out, despite being given a list of people I really don't like. Damn thing just won't get the hint.
default_dry.png


Laws don't keep guns out of the criminals hands. They don't care about the laws............... Hence, the word "criminal". Gun ownership restriction only empowers them, by making their already target-rich environment and even more so.

When you say "strictest gun laws", do these laws limit or inhibit ownership? I can tell you that limiting ownership does NOT decrease violent crime in any way. The statistics spell it out. The US States with the strictest gun ownership laws have the most violent crime cases per capita, with the inverse applicable as well. There are towns and cities around the US with mandatory household ownership laws, and they all have extremely low violent crime rates. We just went on a family vacation to Norris Lake in Tennessee. the caretaker of the property we rented told me the county we were in had the highest CCW/capita percentage in the state, and the lowest violet crime rate.

And yes, I absolutely think it would be a safer world if the would-be criminals knew there was a very good chance their intended victim was carrying. Put yourself in the shoes of the mugger or home intruder. Who are you gonna hit? The one who might shoot you or the one who can't? The most effective thing the airlines could do to eliminate hijackings would be to issue a single-shot 9mm, loaded with "safety slugs", to every willing adult passenger who boards. For every lunatic you hand a weapon to, there would be a couple hundred perfectly sane people who just want to get where they are going. The events of 9/11 would have never happened, guaranteed. Flight 93 proved that, even without a gun.

Thanks. Brad.

Titan Racing Components

BlackJack Hydros

Model Machine And Precision LLC
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Having a gun or not having a gun dosnt solve this drone problem if any thing it gets you in trouble when you use it on a drone.
 
Ken,

Nope. We got a bit off topic. I do believe a few trashed drones might lead toward more "responsible" operation of them, though. Some, at least.....

Thanks. Brad.

Titan Racing Components

BlackJack Hydros

Model Machine And Precision LLC
 

Latest posts

Back
Top