AWaddle322
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2003
- Messages
- 410
Mikey,
It is not Evansville job to send meters anywere and Have them tested at this point. I am certainly not suggesting that Evansville ar anyone else has done anything wrong. I personnally dont care if Equi db meter was on a tripod or not If the DB were side by side and pointed in the same direction how would a tripod alter the readings? the difference in 1 to 2 db ie enough to dq someone so there should be no variance between the meters. The difference between 1 to 7 db is huge, not even in the same ball park huge.
Mr Bendict had a tuff job at the nats ( i sure would not have wanted it). There is no reason for this to be a tuff job though. its cut and dry as soon as the meter issue is resolved.
I will also add that I highly doubt that anything that you buy at radio shack is going to be accurate enough to appease this rule. I have never bought anything from radio shack that worked they way it was supposed to and lasted any length of time. In Mr Bendict case if had a good meter and it was calabrated correctly there would not even be this discusion ( time will only tell if he did have a good meter that was calabrated correctly). What this hole thing to me is about is the wide range 4 meter showed (so what if they are not on a tripod, Does a tripod applify sound) also the rule states that it is highly recommended for it to be on a tripod not a necesatity. Mikey, please explain if the meter that were hand held we not being used correctly (had hand over front plate, pointed in wrong dirrection) because i really dont get why you keep saying something about a tripod!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Not picking on anyone. O and I still believe that the noise rule is a good thing but I am trying to point out the bugs that need to be worked out.
Sincerely,
Allen Waddle
Mikey,
After rereading your post are you implying that John equi was inbetween the meter and the boat on the course?
Allen
It is not Evansville job to send meters anywere and Have them tested at this point. I am certainly not suggesting that Evansville ar anyone else has done anything wrong. I personnally dont care if Equi db meter was on a tripod or not If the DB were side by side and pointed in the same direction how would a tripod alter the readings? the difference in 1 to 2 db ie enough to dq someone so there should be no variance between the meters. The difference between 1 to 7 db is huge, not even in the same ball park huge.
Mr Bendict had a tuff job at the nats ( i sure would not have wanted it). There is no reason for this to be a tuff job though. its cut and dry as soon as the meter issue is resolved.
I will also add that I highly doubt that anything that you buy at radio shack is going to be accurate enough to appease this rule. I have never bought anything from radio shack that worked they way it was supposed to and lasted any length of time. In Mr Bendict case if had a good meter and it was calabrated correctly there would not even be this discusion ( time will only tell if he did have a good meter that was calabrated correctly). What this hole thing to me is about is the wide range 4 meter showed (so what if they are not on a tripod, Does a tripod applify sound) also the rule states that it is highly recommended for it to be on a tripod not a necesatity. Mikey, please explain if the meter that were hand held we not being used correctly (had hand over front plate, pointed in wrong dirrection) because i really dont get why you keep saying something about a tripod!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Not picking on anyone. O and I still believe that the noise rule is a good thing but I am trying to point out the bugs that need to be worked out.
Sincerely,
Allen Waddle
Mikey,
After rereading your post are you implying that John equi was inbetween the meter and the boat on the course?
Allen