This is an extremely important issue. I believe there are a few things we can do to improve the “INTEGRITY” of our noise-level testing.
First, almost everyone is running high-end equipment, boats, motors, and radios because we all want to be as competitive as possible. We seem willing to spend vast amounts of money to add a few MPH’s to a boat, but when we go to buy an important piece of equipment (Sound Decibel Meter), we settle for the cheapest one on the market.
Radio Shack’s web site only listed one unit when I searched this morning and it was a whopping $49.99, and it is advertised as:
“Restore balance to your life.
Get precise readings when you fine-tune audio response of a stereo, PA or home theater system in combination with an equalizer.
And,
Disclaimer: This meter should be used for home/hobbyist use only. This meter does not meet the requirements set forth by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), Standard S1.4.
http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.js...rentPage=search
When I searched the web, I found Industrial strength Db Meters and Calibration units all the way up to $500 and they do meet the ANSI Standard.
Here is a site:
http://www.monarchinstrument.com/Sound.htm
I suspect there is a difference in the quality and reliability of this equipment. I am not proposing that every club spend that much money, but for our annual Regatta, maybe we should demand high quality Dd measuring equipment that has been recently calibrated and certified. If we get DQ’ed then, at least it was with quality test equipment.
Moron’s post listed the IMPBA rules. In C #1 he says, “the unit should be positioned 4-6 feet above the ground”. What effect does this placement have if the unit is stationed on a hill 15-feet about the water, vs. readings taken 4-6 feet above the actual water level?
Just some of my initial thoughts for the groups consideration.
Charlie Blackwell………….