Kyle,
Marx was wrong about everything. Everything. In all his works. And it's incredibly ironic how you suggest that those in power try and propagandize us against the failed ideology he inadvertently created, when, in reality, it is those most hungry for power who are trying to propagandize us toward it.
Subjugation... As I said... Not the word I would choose for a system that has provided far more freedom than any other to date, and your cited definition only validates that fact. How can the freedom to own private property mean "to bring under control"? Truly a mobius strip of circular logic.
The US Constitution is a document that spells out how our government will NOT control us. The Bill of Rights was not an afterthought. It was not an addition, nor a correction. It was written separately for highlight. It was meant to say, "But, more importantly than ALL that...." It is both the reason for the Constitution's writing and the means by which it will be kept. Every single article stipulates an individual right and mandates that the federal government does not and will not ever be of authority to infringe upon it.
And I love your conspiracy theory about the bison. A true revisionist historian.
"Without an employer".... Disingenuous at best. It is the workers and consumers who have chosen capitalism. Democratically. Because it provides the greatest access to sustenance. So, yes... Without our employers, we would be far worse off. Not because we would be deprived of anything, but because there would be so very little to be deprived of. As I said, no institution imposed the necessity of work. Life is work. Employers simply remove the obligation of investment. Employment is simply the path of least resistance to prosperity. You're welcome.
Thanks. Brad.
Titan Racing Components
BlackJack Hydros
Model Machine and Precision LLC
"Marx was wrong about everything. Everything. In all his works.....">>>Have you ever read Das Kapital? lol obviously not. Do you often go around telling people about books you've never read?
"How can the freedom to own private property mean "to bring under control"....">>> Because you Brad, are allowed to believe, that private property means your house, which it does not. Private property in economic terminology, refers to owning the means of production, owning the resources that would otherwise be held in common. Your house is considered personal property, because it is a cost, it does not produce capital. So when those things that are required for survival (food, water shelter, and healthcare), are owned privately, it means you have NO RIGHT to them, because they belong to someone else. And therefore you are "subjugated", in some fashion, to some property owner, for sustenance. "Freedom" is relative, to ones bank account.
". The Bill of Rights was not an afterthought. It .....">>>>It is funny that you say this, because it is an untrue statement. The Bill of Rights were a response precisely to the mass protests and riots, that came about, after the public release of the first draft of the constitution. Which sent the constitutional committee back behind closed doors, which produced the constitutional amendments, aka Bill of Rights.
" It is the workers and consumers who have chosen capitalism. Democratically. >>>>No worker has ever been given the choice, a democratic, up or down vote for capitalism in the U.S. Did the American Indian vote for capitalism? When workers in other parts of the world vote for, let's say 'socialism', the US is there to over throw the will of the demos in those countries e.g. 1953 Iran, the Iranian people voted for socialism (Mohammad Mosaddegh), and the CIA over threw their government. 1955 Vietnam, the Vietnamese voted for socialism (Ho Chi Minh) US sent in the army. 1954 Guatemala, the Guatemalan people voted for socialism, (Jacobo Árbenz) the CIA over threw their government. 1973 Chile, the Chilean people voted for socialism (Salvador Allende), the CIA over threw their government. 2002 Venezuela, the Venezuelan people voted for socialism (Hugo Chavez) the CIA backed a coup that kidnapped Chavez, but the coup failed (chalk one up for the working class). These are just examples of what happens when workers actually get a chance to vote against capitalism..the capitalists always strike back...they hate democracy and try to, and do, control it very tightly here in the US. And there are dozens of examples of worker revolutions, not mentioned here, where the US intervened to support capitalist and right wing authoritarianism.
"Because it provides the greatest access to sustenance...">>>Question; "how" does it provide the "greatest" access? And remember "access" is the key word; meaning to get 'access' to the sustenance, you must have the money, how do you get the money? By subjugating yourself to the property owner.
I'm just gonna summarize here a bit, I know this is just all wasted time on you...the Baby Boomer generation, is known as the worst generation in US history, precisely because they were the most propagandized against generation ever (and that did spill over into gen x as well)with McCarthyism, the 2nd red scare, the cold war etc etc.. You have no original thought in your head, you are programmed. You Brad, are a product of neo-liberal doctrine and their institutions such as: Carnegie Endowment, RAND Corporation, FreedomWorks, Woodrow Wilson International Center, Brookings Institution, Cato Institute, American Enterprise Institute, etc etc...all these corporation and more deal with public relations, which means they deal in on how to manipulate you into thinking what they want you to think. You really didn't stand a chance bro..