Thanks Rick and Kim,Ron/Bob, thanks to you both for the efforts on making the rules for the outboard classes more defined and clear, hopefully in the end we will be able to set up our fleets to maybe run in all the classes in both NAMBA and IMPBA races!!! that would be cool. kim and I both have boats ready for (D Supperstock) supper pro K&B can exaust, CMB45, Erne L motor mnt., K&B Lower , Can Exaust. (GAS TUNNEL) We are close to finishing our tunnel there are three in our area now, I make four! one is running a (x-ray) lower(young tunnel hull and lower) the other one is home made, very nice much like the x-ray/insane affixed to the transome in a typical mannor. Ron you have set up a gas tunnel and relize the expence envolved! I do not have a problem with a racer that builds his own lower set up as long as it follows a normal conventional style, Ron/ Bob thats your job to confirm the outline of the rules and guidelines, cost is very high depending on whos boat and set up you go with I'm well over $2000.00 and please do not limmit motors cc's at this time !!! the class needs breathing room to build i just bought a (zen 300 stock stroker 29.5) I thought it would be a good choise maybe save on cables, you have to finish to win,stay alive!!! Please stay on course with your efforts,get-er-done Rick & Kim Lindow
Dion,Would these tunnels pass the " no tunnel aft transom" rule? They are both production hulls. The tunnel extends around 3 inches on the gas tunnel
LOL. Shane. It's not that at all. Sounds more like a lot of guys that want things to simply stay as they are, don't ruffle the feathers, let us run whatever we want to run as long as there are no outboard definitions defining what an outboard truly is. Bob started this thread to get ideas across the board. These are much needed changes and will help the overall integrity of the tunnel classes. The rouge lower unit issue is only one of them. It may upset people in the beginning but overall, it should have been done years ago. How can anyone look at the pics posted above and say that is an outboard? It is simply an inboard with a rotating mount. There is no transom whatsoever, and no lower unit. Its a skeleton at best. Majority rules in any organization. If the majority wants to keep the "run-what-you-brung" mentality, and let this keep migrating over to the rest of the nitro, and then FE classes as well, I guess that is up to the NAMBA and IMPBA Membership.This is turning into a witch hunt ! This isn't helping the sport any , I don't like lee crafts, can you make a rule so Ron can't race them.
(lol)
So you agree Otto's boat represents the spirit of the class Bob ?I have no issues with John Otto's 40 tunnel. I think it is very cool and very ingenious. What I don't want to see is a tunnel with the motor mounted in the middle of the boat, with some sort of swivel mount and the prop sticking out two feet behind the boat. This does not represent the spirit and intent of the rules.
So you agree Otto's boat represents the spirit of the class Bob ?I have no issues with John Otto's 40 tunnel. I think it is very cool and very ingenious. What I don't want to see is a tunnel with the motor mounted in the middle of the boat, with some sort of swivel mount and the prop sticking out two feet behind the boat. This does not represent the spirit and intent of the rules.
Those at least mount to a vertical outboard transom. Would be better, thats for sure.Actually at the WTC with Joe & Wayne there were 2 in 2011, 3 in 2012 and 3 in 2013. looks like a crisis to me. I'm gonna copy one of these next.
Enter your email address to join: