izitbrokeyet?
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2003
- Messages
- 1,908
I don’t have a dog in this fight but I thought I might try to offer a fresh perspective on the noise issue.
Without getting into details
This point of view comes with a firm grounding in OSHA and in public perception.
I’ll try my best to boil down my point of view for everyone:
From an insurance point of view: the sound level limits stated by OSHA are great and are useful if you are in a situation where you could have to defend against a claim of hearing damage. OSHA does not in any way address and certainly doesn’t alleviate what is perceived as nuisance noise by non-boaters.
I see a lot of talking about what is an acceptable noise level, but if you go up against a community association “even if you own the property” you will loose because your local politicians will weigh the voices of their constituents (them) and boaters (us).
Boaters will come up short if we don’t control ourselves, our noise will be controlled by others.
Without getting into details
This point of view comes with a firm grounding in OSHA and in public perception.
I’ll try my best to boil down my point of view for everyone:
From an insurance point of view: the sound level limits stated by OSHA are great and are useful if you are in a situation where you could have to defend against a claim of hearing damage. OSHA does not in any way address and certainly doesn’t alleviate what is perceived as nuisance noise by non-boaters.
I see a lot of talking about what is an acceptable noise level, but if you go up against a community association “even if you own the property” you will loose because your local politicians will weigh the voices of their constituents (them) and boaters (us).
Boaters will come up short if we don’t control ourselves, our noise will be controlled by others.
Last edited by a moderator: