While I do agree, calling starts is an issue, I think we have an even bigger issue to deal with and that's the corners. When you have several boats doing 50+, it's almost impossible to have an accurate call in terms of lane violations and, in some cases, buoy cuts. For example, you have two white boats in close proximity, one cuts a buoy. Can you tell, within a second or two, which boat it was, especially if they have very similar graphics? We may need to have some sort of high level camera platform just for this kind of situation as well. Then again, how do you use that high level camera? Is it used as a review only(like in the NFL) or is it used to make the calls, meaning you would need someone watching a monitor for the entire heat?
Hydro, this brings up a good point. There is a dynamic at play here that some boaters just wont recognize... "SPEED vs OPTICS"... Everyone thinks they can see everything going at distance and full speed, but in the corners, as you just mentioned, there is confusion.
All forms of racing use "cameras" to capture every aspect of a race, heck, even PINE WOOD DERBY competitions are using cameras to capture starts, finishes and such.. Our racing is clearly more sophisticated than Pine Wood Derby, but as I mentioned, we are stuck in 19th century thinking.
http://grandprix-software-central.com/index.php
There are many tools out there that we could incorporate ( along with well written rules ) that could make racing calls that much better. Simply saying accepting a bad call is a part of racing is to admit the system is flawed, and if the system is flawed, then it cannot be equal or fair.
Corner Drones, hovering above a corner can send live streaming video to a laptop at the CD table, and this video can be reviewed by a corner judge should there be some dispute over who did what..
Lets accept reality for a moment, some of our gas boats are going 80+ mph side by side, each pushing a giant roostertail over 20 feet long and once they turn, vision is obscured of the outside boats and for the most part, CD's have to "guess" at what happened, versus "knowing" what happened.
WIth a well written "review" rule, we could settle these disputes after the completion of a heat and the use of Drone Footage over a corner.
Cost is a non factor, most people have a laptop, there is good software already out there to capture and replay video from whatever source and Drones are easily affordable.
If the Pine Wood Derby felt that the use of replay cameras brought fairness and equality to their racing platforms, what is wrong with us?
Just because we have used mic cords and clipboards for decades doesnt mean we ignore progress in the future.