Terry Keeley
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2002
- Messages
- 7,220
I tried the FSR coupling with the needle bearing and it slipped the same.
I got my Consigliere to have a look at one of the sprag type bearings and the rpm graphs and he came up with a great idea. What if you put in stronger springs so the sprags stayed hooked up better? He also had the idea to use a bit of rubber o ring to test it. His consulting fee just went up a bunch (again).
It did slip on a few earlier runs but it was better after I leaned the needle a little and the motor smoothed out, night and day tho from other runs with the stock springs. I'm going to order some proper springs and hopefully they'll hold.
Here's an rpm plot of run D with a little slippage:
Closeup at 15K:
Here's a smooth run (F):
Anyway I'm going in the right direction I think. When they said these types of dynos were consistent they weren't kidding. I got three runs within 0.08 HP of each other with virtually the same torque.
All three together, EGT & CHT are identical:
I got my Consigliere to have a look at one of the sprag type bearings and the rpm graphs and he came up with a great idea. What if you put in stronger springs so the sprags stayed hooked up better? He also had the idea to use a bit of rubber o ring to test it. His consulting fee just went up a bunch (again).
It did slip on a few earlier runs but it was better after I leaned the needle a little and the motor smoothed out, night and day tho from other runs with the stock springs. I'm going to order some proper springs and hopefully they'll hold.
Here's an rpm plot of run D with a little slippage:
Closeup at 15K:
Here's a smooth run (F):
Anyway I'm going in the right direction I think. When they said these types of dynos were consistent they weren't kidding. I got three runs within 0.08 HP of each other with virtually the same torque.
All three together, EGT & CHT are identical:
Last edited: