Kelly, your offshore proposal is awesome, why, it make sence?brooks93 said:good point.. I will go back to my hole.. LOL. I to do not race any N1 class's so I guess I really don't have a right to say jack..I blame this all on my inner child.. LOL He has a big mouth sometimes .. ok ok all the time
I guess the point I was trying to make is that If the west coasty's don't want to change then don't (if it does pass) at what race is it required to meet the rules to the T (only the Nats other wise it up to the club) Just like Drobies club.. They run 19T's now at there race in N1. Why Heck I don't know because the like it I guess.. I mean the guys in the CAFE club are running lipos in offshore.. We know we can't go to a race and use them but, nothing in place to stop us from racing them at our CAFE CUP or at our club races.
I guess N1 is huge where they run 19T's at in the Midwest but, everywhere else its 27T and not that huge.. So I guess the 19T purposal is a jump start in this area and a kick in the pants out on the west coast...
won't know the answer to that question until the votes are counted.. Darin might be the tip of the iceberg as far as keeping it 27T but, then he might be the tip of the ant hill.. We won't know until all the votes are countedBig picture?
The same goes for my beloved offshore purposal that I took heat on for 6 months until we got the bugs worked out
90230[/snapback]
Yep that be him Dick.. Problem is he is a slippery litte guy.. Here one minute gone the next..Hey, wait, is that what that inner child sounds like? I'm about to kick him in the.......
Dick, we'll let Tonya Harding take care of your knees, so don't beat yourself up. LOLcrowebar said:My knee-jerk reaction is that you are screwing up an entry level class for the benefit of the veterans. It sounds selfish and self serving to fine tune another class for the old guys. If you aren't willing to promote it as it is you may need to re-evaluate your priorities. Again, this is my knee-jerk reaction and I should probably emphasize the jerk part (me)!
If there is a valid argument in favor of going to 19T, that's it. You have a disconnected, completely objective ROAR official encouraging us to consider it. Good enough for me.As I remember my days in racing the boats, I can see the interest you would have in the 19 turn motors. It offers the extra torque you
need to launch your boat with the propellers required to go fast. I
would encourage your organization to study the use of 19 turn motors. It
may have advantages for boat racing that wouldn't benefit the cars.
The "benefit" he's discussing, however, has to do strictly with a POTENTIAL to increase performance of these boats...drobie said:I there is a valid argument in favor of going to 19T, that's it. You have a disconnected, completely objective ROAR official encouraging us to consider it. Good enough for me.As I remember my days in racing the boats, I can see the interest you would have in the 19 turn motors. It offers the extra torque you
need to launch your boat with the propellers required to go fast. I
would encourage your organization to study the use of 19 turn motors. It
may have advantages for boat racing that wouldn't benefit the cars.
90297[/snapback]
I think this will be a milestone vote in many ways:crowebar said:Could be the first time a NAMBA electric proposal gets more then 10 votes!Dick
90303[/snapback]
Larry,TRUCKPULL said:When are we going to vote???Larry
90332[/snapback]
We were "supposed" to get ballots by Feb 15. NAMBA has had the proposals since the first week in January.Darin Jordan said:I was under the impression that we were suppose to be getting ballots in April...TRUCKPULL said:When are we going to vote???Larry
90332[/snapback]
90333[/snapback]
crowebar said:Will this be better for the newbie? 2 to 3 MPH justifies having every N1 racer buy a new Motor to be legal under NAMBA? Are you kidding me?
Honestly, I was leaning towards the 19's but the more I look into it the less it makes sense? Perhaps some of the weakes arguements I've seen. And do you really think N1 will be revived with the 19 turn? I don't know how it will but I've been wrong before. My gut tells me it's not popular out your way because your plate is full with other classes. We do well out here with it but don't run any offshore classes. Imagine if we proposed offshore rules which were just as screwy as this 19 turn thing becuse we were sure it would revive offshore out here?
Big picture?
Dick
90229[/snapback]
Kevin Whitehead said:The two real good arguments for changing are:1. Decreasing the gap so that transitioning to N2 (or faster) is easier
2. Doing something (anything) to attempt to save N1 Hydro
...KW
90354[/snapback]
Enter your email address to join: