Brad Christy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2002
- Messages
- 1,391
Kyle,So, healthcare, retirement, food, housing and education are "frivolous"?
Clinton over saw the biggest reduction in welfare spending and benefits so far, in US history.
A big part of the tax policy of Reaganomics is to shift the tax burden from the top 1% and big corporations, onto the working class. Any tax cut for the "rich" is an eventual tax increase on the middle class, as it forces localities to make up for lost federal revenue.
Nothing that compels the labor of another can be a "right". Nobody is denying anybody access to literally any of that. We all have the right to gain access to these capacities. Nobody has the right to force others to pick up the check for them.
You did get one thing correct though: "Any tax cut for the "rich" is an eventual tax increase on the middle class," just not the reasoning. It's a concept called opportunity costs. When employers are forced to pay taxes, it's money from their payroll budget that pays for it. The reason Clinton saw the greatest reduction in welfare spending in US history is because of the massive reduction is the number of people requiring the assistance, and the massive amount of available funds to cover the remaining costs. The reason the tax "burden" "shifted" from the wealthy to the middle class is because there were so many more taxable incomes within the middle class to collect from. The reality is that we all paid more because we were all collectively making more. This is probably the most significant difference between the Leftist perspective on the economy and that of the Right: The Right looks to increase the size of the pie. The Left looks to move the cuts in the pie. One way works. The other doesn't.
Thanks. Brad.
Titan Racing Components
BlackJack Hdyros
Model Machine and Precision LLC