Hydro Junkie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
- Messages
- 5,806
So, are you Pats fans going to say the same thing about the non-call where the defensive back fell and then grabbed Lockette's foot, tripping him and preventing a completion that stopped a Seahawk drive earlier in the game? That was blatant interference no matter how you look at it. Sorry guys, I don't agree with the ref's not calling that one and since the DB hit Lockette from behind and interfered with his ability to catch the ball by knocking him off balance and to the ground, I don't agree with you either. I do agree with you about both having the right to the ball but, when the DB had to go through a receiver to do so, it's interference. If the shoe was on the other foot and Richard Sherman was the one intercepting the pass, I'm sure you all would be saying the same thing
Last edited by a moderator: