This EXACT subject and discussion took place in NAMBA a couple of years ago. District 1 put it up for a National Vote. The EXACT SAME discussions took place. The EXACT SAME Canadian Racers were mentioned.
Many lobbyed for NO change, and Many lobbyed to change for the very reasons mentioned here, especially by Brian Blazer. It seemed like a toss up. Eric Bourlet and Mark Anderson actually tested the same boat with both setups, and to my knowledge, determined no speed advantage....just different adjustments needed on each setup, to achieve basically the same results, and to my recollection, the determination was that the transom mount had a slim advantage in "ease", but each hull design is deifferent, and will react different to each setup.
I personally run an AC Sport 40, strut underneath, and have no issues. I'm thrilled with the way it runs. I personally could care less, but voted for it.....thinking why not give boaters a choice.
Results of the national vote: It got shot down. The "underneath" voters lobbyed stronger.
Be careful with the wording of your rule proposal. The legnth will come into question, as to how long you can extend out the back.
The Namba D1 proposal had something mentioned around 4", and many believe thats what lost the vote.
Just some FYI. I hope this helps you guys out.
Dave
I HAVE A QUESTION ? WHY IS IT MANDATORY FOR 1/8 SCALE BOATS WITH A COCKPIT TO HAVE A WINDSHEILD WITH A DRIVER ? WHEN YOU CAN PAINT THE WINSHEILD ON THE COWL AND SAVE THE WORK. THAT A LOT OF EXTRA WORK TO DO KNOWING YOU CAN'T SEE THE DRIVER WHEN YOU'RE RACING.