RodneyPierce
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2006
- Messages
- 4,464
..........................
Last edited by a moderator:
With whats been said here and abroad about props you can decide for yourself if only knowing the TE is important. For me in my "school of thought" a gauge that cannot effectively measure leading edge pitch is useless. You are of a different school, so I dont know if your wasting your time, but you are wasting mine, with questions you can answer for yourself as soon as you take some LE numbers with your gauge. Only takes a minute with the right gauge.
Or you could try the "heads up" approach .
Later
Hugh
Yes, you still have to look for SLIP or "PLOW". The LE pitch and RPM only give you the POTENTIAL OPTIMUM SPEED. Therefore if your LE/RPM says you should run 80mph, but you are only running 77 than there is SLIP and you need to add more cup. On the otherhand if you run 82mph then there is PLOW and you need to reduce the TE pitch. What happens with PLOW is that the TE pitch is pushing harder than the LE pitch and is forcing the LE into the dead water in front of the prop. This becomes WASTED horsepower. This PLOWING can actually be seen when running the boat. It is what causes that big trench in the water behind the boat.Thanks David for posting that! And thanks Andy for sharing!
Nice calculation there! Do you not have to worry about slip then? I assume the props are always going to slip some?
:wub: :wub: :wub:ya Rodney what hugh said
No ,I have not. The tethered boats can get away with that much pitch to diameter ratio because they are always going in a circle. We have to hold a straight line and it takes a fairly large rudder and powerul servo to hold a 2.4 P/D ratio prop in a straight line. That prop is about a 3.0 P/D.Hi Andy,
have you ever used a propeller from the tetherd line hydros ? They use in all motor size propeller with dia to pitch ratio of Pi ( 3,1415.. ) ,so a 60 mm Dia Prop for 60 size engine has 188,.. mm pitch 2,36"/7,42" .
Hi Andy,Christian,
Congrat on your successes and many innovations.
I have also given steerable struts much thought for SAW. With the newly availible high powered servos and batteries, the system may have some potential. We have build a .12 nitro boat with this system some years ago, but have not taken the time to test it. For initial test we have a small skeg. Tommy Lee of Tunnel boat fame told me that he tried to run his SAW tunnel boat without a skeg and the boat would not track straight. That confirmed my hunch that prop thrust angle alone is not enough to over come prop walk, even with average P/D ratios.
Andy,Christian,
Congrat on your successes and many innovations.
I have also given steerable struts much thought for SAW. With the newly availible high powered servos and batteries, the system may have some potential. We have build a .12 nitro boat with this system some years ago, but have not taken the time to test it. For initial test we have a small skeg. Tommy Lee of Tunnel boat fame told me that he tried to run his SAW tunnel boat without a skeg and the boat would not track straight. That confirmed my hunch that prop thrust angle alone is not enough to over come prop walk, even with average P/D ratios.
Enter your email address to join: