dwilfong Well-Known Member Joined Jul 1, 2008 Messages 5,979 Feb 27, 2014 #21 Yes the S40 is a "hopper" But the self moded 2167/3 no hop and real nice in the coner. But if you don't have the power it is no faster than a 1667 or old H50 done right.
Yes the S40 is a "hopper" But the self moded 2167/3 no hop and real nice in the coner. But if you don't have the power it is no faster than a 1667 or old H50 done right.
Danny King Well-Known Member Supporting Member Joined Nov 26, 2012 Messages 2,371 Feb 27, 2014 #22 Ouch!
dwilfong Well-Known Member Joined Jul 1, 2008 Messages 5,979 Feb 27, 2014 #23 "Ouch" what happen Danny you pinch your self.
Danny King Well-Known Member Supporting Member Joined Nov 26, 2012 Messages 2,371 Feb 27, 2014 #24 Dam zipper.
Tom Levescy Well-Known Member Joined Nov 10, 2004 Messages 649 Feb 28, 2014 #25 dwilfong said: DSCN2025.JPGHere is a Andy Brown S40 prop. Click to expand... I ran these but in stainless on my cmb 67 green head roadrunner twin. It loved them. They never hopped in the corners. But that boat is long gone now.
dwilfong said: DSCN2025.JPGHere is a Andy Brown S40 prop. Click to expand... I ran these but in stainless on my cmb 67 green head roadrunner twin. It loved them. They never hopped in the corners. But that boat is long gone now.
Andy Brown Well-Known Member Joined Feb 8, 2003 Messages 2,657 Mar 2, 2014 #26 I think Allan was saying that his S-40's hopped, because of "little bends". I never had an S-40 hop, unless of course there was too much shaft angle.
I think Allan was saying that his S-40's hopped, because of "little bends". I never had an S-40 hop, unless of course there was too much shaft angle.
Andy Brown Well-Known Member Joined Feb 8, 2003 Messages 2,657 Mar 2, 2014 #27 I ran the 6545/3 on the Gas SGX today. Ran back to back with a 2167/3 cupped 6.7". The 6545/3 also has 6.7" on the T.E. Picked up 3 mph @17,500 and the engine pulled the 6545/3 just as easily as the 2167/3. The prop handled perfectly on the boat. Will test on a single 101 SGX next. Last edited by a moderator: Mar 2, 2014
I ran the 6545/3 on the Gas SGX today. Ran back to back with a 2167/3 cupped 6.7". The 6545/3 also has 6.7" on the T.E. Picked up 3 mph @17,500 and the engine pulled the 6545/3 just as easily as the 2167/3. The prop handled perfectly on the boat. Will test on a single 101 SGX next.
dwilfong Well-Known Member Joined Jul 1, 2008 Messages 5,979 Mar 2, 2014 #28 Andy is that one of the new SS castings?
Scott Miller Well-Known Member Supporting Member Joined Oct 1, 2011 Messages 719 Mar 19, 2014 #29 I was wondering how a 1967 would perform (same diameter 2 blade with more pitch). I run the same hull with a 91 HR (modified drum). Have you guys tried that?
I was wondering how a 1967 would perform (same diameter 2 blade with more pitch). I run the same hull with a 91 HR (modified drum). Have you guys tried that?
Buckshot Well-Known Member Supporting Member Joined Dec 22, 2003 Messages 4,214 Mar 19, 2014 #30 I ran 1967's on my old single 90/100 Eagle SGX a few times, ran okay.
Scott Miller Well-Known Member Supporting Member Joined Oct 1, 2011 Messages 719 Mar 19, 2014 #31 Here is a picture of mine