captwalter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2003
- Messages
- 439
All NAMBA and NAMBA/IMPBA members can and should vote on this proposed rule change.
Jack St.Clair from District 3 has written the following:
VOTE NO on the SPORT CLASSES RULE CHANGE!
WHY??? The new rule, if passed, states that "The strut may not extent past the rudder". OK. Well how far may the rudder extend past the rear of the transom? 4 inches, 6 inches, 12 inches? Who's to say? Then it goes on to state, "Extension struts will not be allowed. The strut must be of the standard over-the-counter type or a similiarly styled scratch built unit". So What? Who cares? A strut BRACKET could be fabricated and used to extend the strut back as far as you want. No distinction of what parts might be included in the definition of STRUT or limitations of the length from the transom to the rear of the strut have been included in the new rule. This new rule proposal is absolutely ridiculous, as it ultimately states (and can obviously be intentionally misconstrued by some) that you can do whatever you want to do with the strut placement. I believe the rules should stay as they are. The Sport 40 class is a great class as it is and as it was designed to be.
VOTE NO AND SEND IN YOU BALLOT TODAY. The deadline is March 1st. Thank you, Jack St. Clair, NAMBA #1503
To read Jack's complete letter go to www.namba3.net
I support Jack on this and request all members that want to see the sport classes survive to vote NO! Perry P. Walter, NAMBA #831
Jack St.Clair from District 3 has written the following:
VOTE NO on the SPORT CLASSES RULE CHANGE!
WHY??? The new rule, if passed, states that "The strut may not extent past the rudder". OK. Well how far may the rudder extend past the rear of the transom? 4 inches, 6 inches, 12 inches? Who's to say? Then it goes on to state, "Extension struts will not be allowed. The strut must be of the standard over-the-counter type or a similiarly styled scratch built unit". So What? Who cares? A strut BRACKET could be fabricated and used to extend the strut back as far as you want. No distinction of what parts might be included in the definition of STRUT or limitations of the length from the transom to the rear of the strut have been included in the new rule. This new rule proposal is absolutely ridiculous, as it ultimately states (and can obviously be intentionally misconstrued by some) that you can do whatever you want to do with the strut placement. I believe the rules should stay as they are. The Sport 40 class is a great class as it is and as it was designed to be.
VOTE NO AND SEND IN YOU BALLOT TODAY. The deadline is March 1st. Thank you, Jack St. Clair, NAMBA #1503
To read Jack's complete letter go to www.namba3.net
I support Jack on this and request all members that want to see the sport classes survive to vote NO! Perry P. Walter, NAMBA #831