Sounds good to me, what roostertail will it be in?It will get a vote but will be seperated from the other proposal
Everyone has an opinion ours just differs. Lets all vote and see what happens.Well, then it looks like the thing is going to sit on the Fracken shelf I guess.
The UNDER HULL mounting of the strut needs to be tossed out and allowed to be mounted on back of the transome ala rigger style.
Or, for that matter, let the builder have the choise of which way the strut will ba mounted..............................
Well, then it looks like the thing is going to sit on the Fracken shelf I guess.
The UNDER HULL mounting of the strut needs to be tossed out and allowed to be mounted on back of the transome ala rigger style.
Or, for that matter, let the builder have the choise of which way the strut will ba mounted..............................
No tabling it would be foolish which was the direction it was heading. Now we're looking at it to be addressed at the same time but as a separate proposal which is good. Let's get all the cards out on the table, get it done so we can put a fork in it and move on to the next crisis.With the strut issue being what it is maybe its best as its own proposal. I dont see that as foolish.
Grim
The next crisis....LMAO :lol: :lol:No tabling it would be foolish which was the direction it was heading. Now we're looking at it to be addressed at the same time but as a separate proposal which is good. Let's get all the cards out on the table, get it done so we can put a fork in it and move on to the next crisis.With the strut issue being what it is maybe its best as its own proposal. I dont see that as foolish.
Grim
Two separate proposals to be voted on at the same time seems like the best approach to me as well.With the strut issue being what it is maybe its best as its own proposal. I dont see that as foolish.
Grim
Enter your email address to join: