- Joined
- Dec 11, 2020
- Messages
- 626
I understand the leverage concept. So, the unload on the prop from moving it back is more than offset by the increase in leverage from the lengthening after-plane.Steve,
Have you ever used a "cheater bar" on a wrench?
Same, same.
Essentially, the CG of the boat is really not a factor as far as prop walk is concerned. It only comes into play, at least laterally, in the turns. So extending the strut doesn't change the CG of the boat, relative to the string between the turn fin and the rudder. The CG DOES, however, come in to play, in regards to a tendency for the boat to blow off. In the relation of CG and the string between the turn fin and the prop, extending the strut does move the CG forward, which increases the props leverage against the attitude of the boat.
At the end of the day, extending the strut is a trade off of vertical leverage for lateral leverage. It's a trade off of a force that you can't easily counter without additional trade-offs, for one that you can.
Thanks. Brad.
Titan Racing Components
BlackJack Hydros
Model Machine and Precision LLC
Over the years I've ran mono's & hydros. Huey 4 point, dragon fly 20, wing ding 60, several 40 & 60 crapshooters. Some of them ran nice and straight, probably would have ran fairly straight at full throttle without a rudder. Others, it took so much left rudder to track straight that it would swerve one way or the other depending upon power level and speed.
I've always ran the rudder on the RH side of prop, I think the next build it's going to be on the left for a starting point - that will probably be another trade-off between straight line tracking and turning. I'm going to find out.
Thanks for sharing your experience and expertise.
Last edited: