I can see this topic came off my remark, AC boats are some of the finest hull's on the market, Barr-Nun, although weight may not be an issue, that hull is a little over built, although it may not be an issue One might say it's a over built hull, it's a great hull no doubt, but you cant say it's not heavy compared to other's?? I am not bashing this hull at all it's to each there own's opinion!!
That may be....but one thing about Andy's boats and if you know Andy, he builds boats to last. Also, they are gelcoated and heavier in that regard, but you don't need to add a 1/2 lb of primer and filler to fill the glass screen door surface like you do on an epoxy hull. Andy's Pro 40 can be run as is with no paint at all. Just throw a few stickers on it and go.....
The original question was if anyone had ran an AC pro 40. There are lots of people who have. The first hulls were plagued with launching issues because of the original bottom design which was a Fisher bottom. That hull could handle more power because of the steps and lack of sponson running surface which also allowed the hull to settle in the corners quicker. This contributed to the hard launching because the small ride surfaces caused the nose to go under water. Once up on plane, things were fine. The remedy is to move the drive dog to the allowable legal limit ( 1 drive dog length behind the transom) and get the prop ears from under the hull.
The newer Pro 40 II hull was modified on the front sponson riding surfaces and filled in with larger surfaces to allow easier launching but with that the hull is more prone to riding lighter and thus blowing over relative to the older hull.
Andy's philosophy has always been to design a boat which will work for the novice to the experienced racer.
My last Pro 40 had a Mac 45 turning a pitched up X-646/3 with the pipe at 10-1/8" and ran well. It was the older original Pro 40 design and was 14 years old....built to last.
Pro 40 I
Pro 40 II