Lay26 said:4lbs is good for a heat racing boat. it can be a bit light in rough conditions.
109551[/snapback]
kenrc said:Looking for ideas on what 21 riggers weight when they are ready to run less fule.
109522[/snapback]
Dale0 said:Ron, why is that? Semms to me the lighter you go, the smaller the footprint could be. What am I missing?
110130[/snapback]
Ron Zaker Jr said:kenrc said:Looking for ideas on what 21 riggers weight when they are ready to run less fule.
109522[/snapback]
The lighter you go,the bigger the foot print has to be.
Ron Jr
110012[/snapback]
John:John Knight said:Ron Zaker Jr said:kenrc said:Looking for ideas on what 21 riggers weight when they are ready to run less fule.
109522[/snapback]
The lighter you go,the bigger the foot print has to be.
Ron Jr
110012[/snapback]
Ron,
Define what you call a bigger footprint. Wider sponson pads; wider sponson spacing; both; longer tub with wider tub; even longer tub with more narrow tub, etc. Your statement is not easily definable (maybe by intent). Just want to undertand what you mean. I believe I know but want to make sure.
Absolutely right about the weight. The lighter it is the more difficult it is to drive due to stability especially in traffic. I have known racers that could drive standard Roadrunners well but could not handle an Extreme at all due to the light weight. Major difference. Like using a SAW boat for heat racing. Lessons were served up for all at the spring nats with the wind, waves and cold. The heavier boats usually were the winners as they stayed on the water. The lighter ones were gone easily.
John
110155[/snapback]
John ,the boat I won the Spring Nats with is an Extreme.I think if the boat is balanced and trimmed out correctly the "lightness" of it isn't THAT big of aMitch Graber said:Absolutely right about the weight. The lighter it is the more difficult it is to drive due to stability especially in traffic. I have known racers that could drive standard Roadrunners well but could not handle an Extreme at all due to the light weight. Major difference. Like using a SAW boat for heat racing. Lessons were served up for all at the spring nats with the wind, waves and cold. The heavier boats usually were the winners as they stayed on the water. The lighter ones were gone easily.
John
110155[/snapback]
Marty said it all! Time to start that new 20 boat Mr DavisMarty Davis said:John:John Knight said:Ron Zaker Jr said:kenrc said:Looking for ideas on what 21 riggers weight when they are ready to run less fule.
109522[/snapback]
The lighter you go,the bigger the foot print has to be.
Ron Jr
110012[/snapback]
Ron,
Define what you call a bigger footprint. Wider sponson pads; wider sponson spacing; both; longer tub with wider tub; even longer tub with more narrow tub, etc. Your statement is not easily definable (maybe by intent). Just want to undertand what you mean. I believe I know but want to make sure.
Absolutely right about the weight. The lighter it is the more difficult it is to drive due to stability especially in traffic. I have known racers that could drive standard Roadrunners well but could not handle an Extreme at all due to the light weight. Major difference. Like using a SAW boat for heat racing. Lessons were served up for all at the spring nats with the wind, waves and cold. The heavier boats usually were the winners as they stayed on the water. The lighter ones were gone easily.
John
110155[/snapback]
I agree with Ron, Jr about the wider front sponson stance. You can add in a few more IMPORTANT items which will help the light boat in rougher race water. If you run a few degrees (2-3) or dihedral and widen the front sponson bottom width, the boat will cushion more in rougher water. You can also narrow the sponson pad some and run a flatter amount of dihedral and it will also be fairly good in race water. If you run a 4 lb boat and another guy runs a 3.5 lb boat, the 3.5 boat will accelerate MUCH faster and if the driver is good, will outrun the heavier boat around the course. I have made the assumption that both boats have good turning characteristics and equal engines and props.
I personally have felt that a race boat of around 3.75 lbs is about the optimum weight.
Consider this: If you have a boat that is 3.5 lbs and is sturdy, you can always add weight to it for different conditions. I have had several that have a 4-6 oz plate that I bolted to the bottom into the wood motor mounts. Makes it REALLY nice when you want to do SAW at the Nats. A quarter pound is a LOT on a top level 20 Hydro in the hands of a very good driver.
The level of driving skill of the driver is MUCH more important than the weight of the boat. It is also super important that the boat be reliable, again more important than the weight of the boat.
If you plan on building a new boat every 2 seasons (or every if you are ambitious), you will automatically keep up with your improving skill level.
This is also kind of like the Horsepower discussion. RELIABILITY in the early stages and increasing attention to ALL detail as you improve over several years.
Interesting discussion, makes me miss 20 hydro a LOT.
Marty Davis
110169[/snapback]
Check this out, it is a cool looking engine: http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LNKKP0&P=GRon Zaker Jr said:Marty said it all! Time to start that new 20 boat Mr DavisMarty Davis said:John:John Knight said:Ron Zaker Jr said:kenrc said:Looking for ideas on what 21 riggers weight when they are ready to run less fule.
109522[/snapback]
The lighter you go,the bigger the foot print has to be.
Ron Jr
110012[/snapback]
Ron,
Define what you call a bigger footprint. Wider sponson pads; wider sponson spacing; both; longer tub with wider tub; even longer tub with more narrow tub, etc. Your statement is not easily definable (maybe by intent). Just want to undertand what you mean. I believe I know but want to make sure.
Absolutely right about the weight. The lighter it is the more difficult it is to drive due to stability especially in traffic. I have known racers that could drive standard Roadrunners well but could not handle an Extreme at all due to the light weight. Major difference. Like using a SAW boat for heat racing. Lessons were served up for all at the spring nats with the wind, waves and cold. The heavier boats usually were the winners as they stayed on the water. The lighter ones were gone easily.
John
110155[/snapback]
I agree with Ron, Jr about the wider front sponson stance. You can add in a few more IMPORTANT items which will help the light boat in rougher race water. If you run a few degrees (2-3) or dihedral and widen the front sponson bottom width, the boat will cushion more in rougher water. You can also narrow the sponson pad some and run a flatter amount of dihedral and it will also be fairly good in race water. If you run a 4 lb boat and another guy runs a 3.5 lb boat, the 3.5 boat will accelerate MUCH faster and if the driver is good, will outrun the heavier boat around the course. I have made the assumption that both boats have good turning characteristics and equal engines and props.
I personally have felt that a race boat of around 3.75 lbs is about the optimum weight.
Consider this: If you have a boat that is 3.5 lbs and is sturdy, you can always add weight to it for different conditions. I have had several that have a 4-6 oz plate that I bolted to the bottom into the wood motor mounts. Makes it REALLY nice when you want to do SAW at the Nats. A quarter pound is a LOT on a top level 20 Hydro in the hands of a very good driver.
The level of driving skill of the driver is MUCH more important than the weight of the boat. It is also super important that the boat be reliable, again more important than the weight of the boat.
If you plan on building a new boat every 2 seasons (or every if you are ambitious), you will automatically keep up with your improving skill level.
This is also kind of like the Horsepower discussion. RELIABILITY in the early stages and increasing attention to ALL detail as you improve over several years.
Interesting discussion, makes me miss 20 hydro a LOT.
Marty Davis
110169[/snapback]
110292[/snapback]
Scooter12195 said:How does the plug cooling fitting attach I wonder? Have to be some kind of quick disconnect.
110322[/snapback]
John Knight said:Scooter12195 said:How does the plug cooling fitting attach I wonder? Have to be some kind of quick disconnect.
110322[/snapback]
Scott,
The Picco 45 I have in my rigger now has a threaded adapter that screws over the plug and into the head and has a small hole drilled in the top for the water to exit. Takes about 8-10 seconds to install. First time I have seen the one in the picture Marty attached. Be interested how it is attached.
John
110360[/snapback]
Enter your email address to join: