- Joined
- Jun 14, 2005
- Messages
- 723
I have notice a long venturi on some boaters engine. What is the purpose or advantage of a long venturi ?
Jeff knows the history, but for the benefit of others, Yours Truly designed the velocity stacks that Tidewater sold for the 1994 CMB Evo engines. They where available for the 45,67/80 and 90 engine. That particular engine had a very short intake tract because the carb was machined in one piece with the backplate. So the stack made a big difference on that engine. CMB later copied part of the mods I was doing to the 80 Evo engine and it came stock from the factory with the Velocity stack.Yes, this info is in numerous two stroke tuner books. Tidewater use to sell velocity stacks in the evo gold head/black case days. I tested several. With a local friend I tested a straight bore velocity stack about 1" long and a tapered bore velocity stack about 1" long on a cmb mod 80. The tapered bore did best, we could run a shorter pipe and launch more prop and the setup ended up faster on the top end because of this, on this particular setup. Jeff Lutz
Jeff knows the history, but for the benefit of others, Yours Truly designed the velocity stacks that Tidewater sold for the 1994 CMB Evo engines. They where available for the 45,67/80 and 90 engine. That particular engine had a very short intake tract because the carb was machined in one piece with the backplate. So the stack made a big difference on that engine. CMB later copied part of the mods I was doing to the 80 Evo engine and it came stock from the factory with the Velocity stack.Yes, this info is in numerous two stroke tuner books. Tidewater use to sell velocity stacks in the evo gold head/black case days. I tested several. With a local friend I tested a straight bore velocity stack about 1" long and a tapered bore velocity stack about 1" long on a cmb mod 80. The tapered bore did best, we could run a shorter pipe and launch more prop and the setup ended up faster on the top end because of this, on this particular setup. Jeff Lutz
The top end richness is not necessarily a bad thing. Often it is a benefit. I mentioned it because that is one effect of the longer vs the shorter. There are several ways to modify the mixture strength curve. The length of the Venturi is one of them.
Jeff knows the history, but for the benefit of others, Yours Truly designed the velocity stacks that Tidewater sold for the 1994 CMB Evo engines. They where available for the 45,67/80 and 90 engine. That particular engine had a very short intake tract because the carb was machined in one piece with the backplate. So the stack made a big difference on that engine. CMB later copied part of the mods I was doing to the 80 Evo engine and it came stock from the factory with the Velocity stack.Yes, this info is in numerous two stroke tuner books. Tidewater use to sell velocity stacks in the evo gold head/black case days. I tested several. With a local friend I tested a straight bore velocity stack about 1" long and a tapered bore velocity stack about 1" long on a cmb mod 80. The tapered bore did best, we could run a shorter pipe and launch more prop and the setup ended up faster on the top end because of this, on this particular setup. Jeff Lutz
The top end richness is not necessarily a bad thing. Often it is a benefit. I mentioned it because that is one effect of the longer vs the shorter. There are several ways to modify the mixture strength curve. The length of the Venturi is one of them.
Yes I knew you designed those stacks, I wanted to point out the tapered versus straight. in 1987 a machinist in my local club built some carbs with long stacks for three guys all running coyote 21's and cmb valvola's , they were also able to launch better props and ran well with them.Jeff knows the history, but for the benefit of others, Yours Truly designed the velocity stacks that Tidewater sold for the 1994 CMB Evo engines. They where available for the 45,67/80 and 90 engine. That particular engine had a very short intake tract because the carb was machined in one piece with the backplate. So the stack made a big difference on that engine. CMB later copied part of the mods I was doing to the 80 Evo engine and it came stock from the factory with the Velocity stack.Yes, this info is in numerous two stroke tuner books. Tidewater use to sell velocity stacks in the evo gold head/black case days. I tested several. With a local friend I tested a straight bore velocity stack about 1" long and a tapered bore velocity stack about 1" long on a cmb mod 80. The tapered bore did best, we could run a shorter pipe and launch more prop and the setup ended up faster on the top end because of this, on this particular setup. Jeff Lutz
The top end richness is not necessarily a bad thing. Often it is a benefit. I mentioned it because that is one effect of the longer vs the shorter. There are several ways to modify the mixture strength curve. The length of the Venturi is one of them.
Hi DocI had one of the stacks of Todewaters on a gold head CMB 90.
One day Iwas running it in a hydro and all of a sudden the motor picked up a lot of rpm.
When I brought the boat In the stack had broken off
So my impression is a long velocity stack increases Torque but reduces rpm
Yes Jeff, we built some tapered units at Tidewater also, but I think just for one size engine. I think the .45. I still have a few of them around here.Jeff knows the history, but for the benefit of others, Yours Truly designed the velocity stacks that Tidewater sold for the 1994 CMB Evo engines. They where available for the 45,67/80 and 90 engine. That particular engine had a very short intake tract because the carb was machined in one piece with the backplate. So the stack made a big difference on that engine. CMB later copied part of the mods I was doing to the 80 Evo engine and it came stock from the factory with the Velocity stack.Yes, this info is in numerous two stroke tuner books. Tidewater use to sell velocity stacks in the evo gold head/black case days. I tested several. With a local friend I tested a straight bore velocity stack about 1" long and a tapered bore velocity stack about 1" long on a cmb mod 80. The tapered bore did best, we could run a shorter pipe and launch more prop and the setup ended up faster on the top end because of this, on this particular setup. Jeff Lutz
The top end richness is not necessarily a bad thing. Often it is a benefit. I mentioned it because that is one effect of the longer vs the shorter. There are several ways to modify the mixture strength curve. The length of the Venturi is one of them.Jeff knows the history, but for the benefit of others, Yours Truly designed the velocity stacks that Tidewater sold for the 1994 CMB Evo engines. They where available for the 45,67/80 and 90 engine. That particular engine had a very short intake tract because the carb was machined in one piece with the backplate. So the stack made a big difference on that engine. CMB later copied part of the mods I was doing to the 80 Evo engine and it came stock from the factory with the Velocity stack.Yes, this info is in numerous two stroke tuner books. Tidewater use to sell velocity stacks in the evo gold head/black case days. I tested several. With a local friend I tested a straight bore velocity stack about 1" long and a tapered bore velocity stack about 1" long on a cmb mod 80. The tapered bore did best, we could run a shorter pipe and launch more prop and the setup ended up faster on the top end because of this, on this particular setup. Jeff Lutz
The top end richness is not necessarily a bad thing. Often it is a benefit. I mentioned it because that is one effect of the longer vs the shorter. There are several ways to modify the mixture strength curve. The length of the Venturi is one of them.Yes I knew you designed those stacks, I wanted to point out the tapered versus straight. in 1987 a machinist in my local club built some carbs with long stacks for three guys all running coyote 21's and cmb valvola's , they were also able to launch better props and ran well with them.Jeff knows the history, but for the benefit of others, Yours Truly designed the velocity stacks that Tidewater sold for the 1994 CMB Evo engines. They where available for the 45,67/80 and 90 engine. That particular engine had a very short intake tract because the carb was machined in one piece with the backplate. So the stack made a big difference on that engine. CMB later copied part of the mods I was doing to the 80 Evo engine and it came stock from the factory with the Velocity stack.Yes, this info is in numerous two stroke tuner books. Tidewater use to sell velocity stacks in the evo gold head/black case days. I tested several. With a local friend I tested a straight bore velocity stack about 1" long and a tapered bore velocity stack about 1" long on a cmb mod 80. The tapered bore did best, we could run a shorter pipe and launch more prop and the setup ended up faster on the top end because of this, on this particular setup. Jeff Lutz
The top end richness is not necessarily a bad thing. Often it is a benefit. I mentioned it because that is one effect of the longer vs the shorter. There are several ways to modify the mixture strength curve. The length of the Venturi is one of them.
. We tested tapered on a mod 80 but it may have been made by our local machinist. John Lalonde also tested straight /versus tapered on some big cmb engines.Yes Jeff, we built some tapered units at Tidewater also, but I think just for one size engine. I think the .45. I still have a few of them around here.Jeff knows the history, but for the benefit of others, Yours Truly designed the velocity stacks that Tidewater sold for the 1994 CMB Evo engines. They where available for the 45,67/80 and 90 engine. That particular engine had a very short intake tract because the carb was machined in one piece with the backplate. So the stack made a big difference on that engine. CMB later copied part of the mods I was doing to the 80 Evo engine and it came stock from the factory with the Velocity stack.Yes, this info is in numerous two stroke tuner books. Tidewater use to sell velocity stacks in the evo gold head/black case days. I tested several. With a local friend I tested a straight bore velocity stack about 1" long and a tapered bore velocity stack about 1" long on a cmb mod 80. The tapered bore did best, we could run a shorter pipe and launch more prop and the setup ended up faster on the top end because of this, on this particular setup. Jeff Lutz
The top end richness is not necessarily a bad thing. Often it is a benefit. I mentioned it because that is one effect of the longer vs the shorter. There are several ways to modify the mixture strength curve. The length of the Venturi is one of them.Jeff knows the history, but for the benefit of others, Yours Truly designed the velocity stacks that Tidewater sold for the 1994 CMB Evo engines. They where available for the 45,67/80 and 90 engine. That particular engine had a very short intake tract because the carb was machined in one piece with the backplate. So the stack made a big difference on that engine. CMB later copied part of the mods I was doing to the 80 Evo engine and it came stock from the factory with the Velocity stack.Yes, this info is in numerous two stroke tuner books. Tidewater use to sell velocity stacks in the evo gold head/black case days. I tested several. With a local friend I tested a straight bore velocity stack about 1" long and a tapered bore velocity stack about 1" long on a cmb mod 80. The tapered bore did best, we could run a shorter pipe and launch more prop and the setup ended up faster on the top end because of this, on this particular setup. Jeff Lutz
The top end richness is not necessarily a bad thing. Often it is a benefit. I mentioned it because that is one effect of the longer vs the shorter. There are several ways to modify the mixture strength curve. The length of the Venturi is one of them.Yes I knew you designed those stacks, I wanted to point out the tapered versus straight. in 1987 a machinist in my local club built some carbs with long stacks for three guys all running coyote 21's and cmb valvola's , they were also able to launch better props and ran well with them.Jeff knows the history, but for the benefit of others, Yours Truly designed the velocity stacks that Tidewater sold for the 1994 CMB Evo engines. They where available for the 45,67/80 and 90 engine. That particular engine had a very short intake tract because the carb was machined in one piece with the backplate. So the stack made a big difference on that engine. CMB later copied part of the mods I was doing to the 80 Evo engine and it came stock from the factory with the Velocity stack.Yes, this info is in numerous two stroke tuner books. Tidewater use to sell velocity stacks in the evo gold head/black case days. I tested several. With a local friend I tested a straight bore velocity stack about 1" long and a tapered bore velocity stack about 1" long on a cmb mod 80. The tapered bore did best, we could run a shorter pipe and launch more prop and the setup ended up faster on the top end because of this, on this particular setup. Jeff Lutz
The top end richness is not necessarily a bad thing. Often it is a benefit. I mentioned it because that is one effect of the longer vs the shorter. There are several ways to modify the mixture strength curve. The length of the Venturi is one of them.
When I saw your name I thought you were going to talk about the k&B stacks that were on a oring for floating. You use to love those!I had one of the stacks of Todewaters on a gold head CMB 90.
One day Iwas running it in a hydro and all of a sudden the motor picked up a lot of rpm.
When I brought the boat In the stack had broken off
So my impression is a long velocity stack increases Torque but reduces rpm
Hi Doc, been running old style CMB, Gray carb, with .550 bore, and the long Venture, made 3 new spray bars, .99 th, 110. th and .119, been running the .110 spray bar, Andy Brown did the mods on the engine, running 10 1/2 length on pipe, when I pull the trigger, the boat is gone, just wish my hands would stop shaking so much, sometimes I JUST CLOSE MY EYES AND LISTEN FOR THAT UGLY SOUND !!!!!!!!!!!Jeff the K&B with the O rings would really let the Venturi reasonate.
They would sound like a 4 barrel carb opening up.
I would love to have such a Venturi on a .550 or .570 carb for a 101. A twin with those carbs would sound AWSOME. Better performance maybe
was this one of the venturi's you designed? I purchased this one back in 1988 from Tidewater (for Picco P67/P80), they were very popular at the time.......Yours Truly designed the velocity stacks that Tidewater sold for the 1994 CMB Evo enginesYes, this info is in numerous two stroke tuner books. Tidewater use to sell velocity stacks in the evo gold head/black case days. I tested several. With a local friend I tested a straight bore velocity stack about 1" long and a tapered bore velocity stack about 1" long on a cmb mod 80. The tapered bore did best, we could run a shorter pipe and launch more prop and the setup ended up faster on the top end because of this, on this particular setup. Jeff Lutz
David,was this one of the venturi's you designed? I purchased this one back in 1988 from Tidewater (for Picco P67/P80), they were very popular at the time.......Yours Truly designed the velocity stacks that Tidewater sold for the 1994 CMB Evo enginesYes, this info is in numerous two stroke tuner books. Tidewater use to sell velocity stacks in the evo gold head/black case days. I tested several. With a local friend I tested a straight bore velocity stack about 1" long and a tapered bore velocity stack about 1" long on a cmb mod 80. The tapered bore did best, we could run a shorter pipe and launch more prop and the setup ended up faster on the top end because of this, on this particular setup. Jeff Lutz
Howard was a Master r/c boater. He did not compete, but his knowledge and skills where astounding.H.E.W.
Howard E Weeks
Going back a couple years.