I am guessing its steel.....If you like i can try and find out what material they are using.
Ken
I am guessing its steel.....If you like i can try and find out what material they are using.
Ken
I am guessing its steel.....If you like i can try and find out what material they are using.
Ken
I was just curious, because the the Zenoah rod has about 20% less cross sectional area than the CMB 91 rod.
Considering the much larger bore and stroke of the Zenoah and the fact that some of them have been reved to 20,000 rpm, I'm guessing Zenoah is using some very good steel for the rod.
But thats only a guess hey Craig??I am guessing its steel.....If you like i can try and find out what material they are using.
Ken
GillI'm working on modifications now to allow 23,000+ rpm's.
Wow I would like to see one of "those' screaming on straights.Our max rpm obtained are 17,100 with reliability using a tacometer on a SGX.
Gill
Sorry, my error Scott. Forgot about this after taking assembly apart. I guess I,m working on too many things at one time, but I will eliminate the washers & rollers when making the new rod.:huh: Quote: Also the rod is not a true "I" beam section & it is not guided in the upper end.
This part: ... it is not guided in the upper end.
Excuse me, but it very much guided at piston pin end. As a matter of fact, the zenoahs have thrust washers that are on both sides of wrist pin needle bearing, and they run inbetween the piston pin boss's.
This design centers the rod on the crank end bearing journal.
:blink: Scott