- Joined
- Sep 7, 2011
- Messages
- 2,399
I'm setting-up a new 67/80 outrigger, I'm contemplating whether to use .250dia flex-cable w/.250dia stub-shaft all the way through? Or .250dia flex-cable w/.250dia step-down-to .187dia stub-shaft?
I already have custom-made .250dia Hughey flex-shafts with under-water Octura Flex Ferrule welded to one end (.250dia flex-cable to .187dia stub-shaft). I'm not sure if there are problems using under-water ferrule (servicing flex-shaft, etc.,...)?
Or is it just better and cleaner using "conventional" flex-shaft (welded directly to stub-shaft)?
I hear under-water ferrule provides security if flex-shaft snaps? But I'm thinking .250dia flex-shaft (welded directly to stub-shaft) should be robust enough?
I already have custom-made .250dia Hughey flex-shafts with under-water Octura Flex Ferrule welded to one end (.250dia flex-cable to .187dia stub-shaft). I'm not sure if there are problems using under-water ferrule (servicing flex-shaft, etc.,...)?
Or is it just better and cleaner using "conventional" flex-shaft (welded directly to stub-shaft)?
I hear under-water ferrule provides security if flex-shaft snaps? But I'm thinking .250dia flex-shaft (welded directly to stub-shaft) should be robust enough?
Last edited by a moderator: