Scott Schneider
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2003
- Messages
- 848
<_< First off: ANDY DON'T HIT ME !! or SHOOT ME. <_<
I am motivated to ask this because I have SOOOOO many pipes of differant size, shape and volume that I must have something damm close to a "45 paribolic" and not even know it ?
The max diameter of the AB paribolic is quite abit larger that most .45 pipes. and theirfor by its larger diameter and longer rear cone it would have a MEAN point of reflection that is further back from the weld seam. Which would make sence that you can run this pipe at 9 1/2" C/L to weld.
So is anyone using any bigger volume pipes? say .67 stuff thats restingered and able to shorten it down to these specs and have it run well?
Some of the older OPS, International, and muck pipes seem very close but are .60 to .80 applications and some big headered and big stingered. Any luck in using non specified pipes on a .45 MAC ??? with good results. :unsure: Scott
I am motivated to ask this because I have SOOOOO many pipes of differant size, shape and volume that I must have something damm close to a "45 paribolic" and not even know it ?
The max diameter of the AB paribolic is quite abit larger that most .45 pipes. and theirfor by its larger diameter and longer rear cone it would have a MEAN point of reflection that is further back from the weld seam. Which would make sence that you can run this pipe at 9 1/2" C/L to weld.
So is anyone using any bigger volume pipes? say .67 stuff thats restingered and able to shorten it down to these specs and have it run well?
Some of the older OPS, International, and muck pipes seem very close but are .60 to .80 applications and some big headered and big stingered. Any luck in using non specified pipes on a .45 MAC ??? with good results. :unsure: Scott
Last edited by a moderator: